Education Day Electrical Engineering | Presentation and Defense: Quality of supporting material

The supporting materials are excellently structured, showing off the whole story as solid, visionary, and ground-breaking;
The support material is original, excellent, inspiring, remarkable (e.g. style, clarity, message) and effective;
There are variety of surprising activation means (going beyond what was expected), e.g. figures, animations, interaction, which feature elements of modern technologies;
There is a real-live, relevant and interesting demo, long to be remembered;
The student has made additional free materials in the public domain, e.g. YouTube video, a publication Wikipedia, Adobe spark video or presentation, promotional account in the social media;
The quality of the slides and the demonstration (balance of visuals and text, font size, readability, consistency of coloring, figures) is excellent.

The supporting material is very well structured, making the story clear and coherent, highlighting the key aspects of the work;
The support material is original, interactive, illustrative, and interesting;
The choice of the supporting material is original and very effective;
The presentation goes beyond the slides, e.g. multiple activation techniques are used, like didactic questioning, drawing on the board, interaction with the audience, embedded demonstration, etc.;
The presentation includes elements of a demonstration, e.g. a physical deliverable of the project, interactive demonstration of a tool, a simple interactive illustrative exercise, a short video;
The quality of the support material is very good and very well tuned to the audience.

The presentation is properly structured, the story is clear and coherent;
The slides/support material are effective;
The choices of the supporting materials are appropriate;
The presentation goes beyond the slides, e.g. at least one activation technique is used, like didactic questioning, drawing on the board, interaction with the audience, embedded demonstration, etc.;
Quality of slides (balance of visuals and text, font size, readability, consistency of coloring, figures, spelling and grammar) is good;
The presentation content is tuned to the audience and reaches the audience;
The student is actively using the slides during the defense discussions;
The presentation is well prepared in all aspects (everything works).

The slides illustrate the project, the work done and the results;
There is an appropriate balance between text, figures, illustrations, tables and formulas in the slides;
An appropriate TU/e style is used for slides (including at least TU/e logo);
The presentation has acceptable structure: introduction, background information, problem statement, body, conclusions; it starts general and then goes to specifics; the slides are readable and stylish.
Material of other sources is used only where relevant, and properly credited;
During the discussions and defense the student can refer back to the slides;
The design of the slides has been reviewed by the supervisor no more than 3 times.

The slides address the work done;
There are a "title" slide, "introduction" slides, a set of body slides, a "conclusions" slide and a "future work" slide;
There are figures, illustrations, tables and/or formulas in the slides;
There is a focus on the message.

When giving feedback for a specific grade, please select its corresponding channel in the chat-box below ↧. Thanks!