Loading...
 

Report: Structure and organization of report

10

  • The report has an easily navigable structure with sections chosen for inspiring exposition of the new knowledge, which work for both experts and non-experts;
  • The style of the report structure is effective and original;
  • The report rivals the best scientific papers in the field;
  • The title may be puzzling, bold, provoking but above all it should be to-the-point;
  • The abstract inspires;
  • Introduction connects technical information with the societal needs;
  • The methodology section is accessible for both experts and non-experts;
  • Visionary discussions on future alternatives, SOTA, and trends in the field
  • Conclusions are visionary and give the profound lessons of the work;
  • There are at least two far-reaching conclusions;
  • There are visionary answers of the research questions;
  • The list of references is complete, objective and non-redundant.

9

  • The report has an original structure with sections chosen for efficient and effective exposition of the new knowledge;
  • Very good structure and logical flow of communicating of the work done;
  • Effective structure, which achieves the student's goals;
  • The report resemble a scientific paper at SOTA level;
  • Optimal structure: the reader gets motivated only by reading the headers of the chapters and sub-chapters;
  • The title is original and focused;
  • Abstract motivates and sells well the work;
  • Optimal and efficient introduction;
  • The methodology section is instructive for experts;
  • Discussions on future alternatives, SOTA, and trends in the field;
  • There are original and motivated answers of the research questions;
  • Conclusions give very relevant lessons;
  • There is at least one far-reaching conclusion;
  • The list of references is complete.

8

  • The report has an optimal structure with sections chosen to clearly document and convey the work done and the acquired knowledge;
  • The structure of the report is clear, the work done becomes visible by reading the headers of the chapters and sub-chapters;
  • The title captures the work done in maximum two lines;
  • Good choice of the title (at least it is directly clear what the report is about);
  • The abstract captures all the essence of the work done in about 12 sentences (less than 20);
  • Good and proficient abstract (at least, one or two paragraphs which make clear what the report is about, what is the main problem solved, and what are the main achieved results);
  • The abstract properly communicates the core contents of the work;
  • The introduction has a clear focus to provide in an effective way all the needed background knowledge and the purpose of the work;
  • There is a good, proficient introduction (including efficiently given background knowledge) with deep discussion on the SOTA;
  • The Introduction properly covers the relevant literature, outlines the dominant problems and defines the main research question(s)/project goals of the work;
  • The methodology choices are motivated and alternatives are discussed;
  • The conclusions answer all the research question(s) and all main lessons of the paper are restated;
  • Good, proficient conclusions (at least, one or two paragraphs which make clear what the main lessons of the work are and how these are supported by the main results/findings of the project);
  • The conclusions give the main lessons of the work;
  • All relevant references are properly given.

7

  • The report has a clear and logical structure with sections which clearly connect with the work done and the acquired knowledge;
  • The title is descriptive (e.g. captures the main points of the work) and appropriate (at least it is clear what the report is about);
  • The abstract captures in brief at least ¾ of the work done, explicitly communicates the core contents of the work and it is appropriate (at least, one or two paragraphs which communicate what the report is about, what is the main problem solved, and what are the main achieved results);
  • The Introduction clearly provides all the needed background knowledge, gives the purpose of the work, covers the basic literature, outlines problems and defines (a) research question(s)/project goals of the work;
  • The methodology is explicitly given;
  • The research question(s) are explicitly answered;
  • The conclusions are explicit and appropriate (at least, one or two paragraphs which communicate what the main lessons (at least two) of the work are and how these are supported by the main results/findings of the project).

6

  • The report includes ordered sections which functionally connect with the work done and the acquired knowledge;
  • The title relates to the work done;
  • The abstract captures in brief at least ½ of the work done;
  • The introduction contains the needed background knowledge and the purpose of the work;
  • The methodology can be extracted from the paper;
  • The conclusions partially answer the research question and there is at least one lesson restated from the paper body;
  • There are at least two main references properly quoted.

When giving feedback for a specific grade, please select its corresponding channel in the chat-box below ↧. Thanks!

Go to the Report category →

Feedback